[p. 268] (Blank Page) [p. 269]

[p. 270] (Blank Page)

[p. 271]

As this book goes to press an experiment at Columbia University conducted upon theories promulgated by two young Chinese physicists - Professor T. D. Lee and Professor C. N. Yang - affords an excellent example of how easily the senses can be deceived into arriving at wrong conclusions. We are, therefore, adding an addendum to explain why neither the premises, nor conclusions, are in accord with Nature.

The essence of what made this discovery so revolutionary that it upset many fundamentally believed in facts of physics lies in the conclusion that all atoms spin in the direction of their motion (meaning the direction of their axis), which means that atoms or particles ejected from the north end of a "decaying" atom, such as cobalt, spin in a right-handed (clockwise) direction, and those which are emitted from the south end spin in a left-handed (anti-clockwise) direction. This discovery led to the possibility that atoms acted like right and left-threaded screws, and that might eventually explain how matter is held together by some mysterious force within matter and solve the mystery of Creation.

This cannot be briefly explained because every single premise upon which the experiment was founded is wrongly assumed to be what it is believed to be. These wrong conceptions must first be clarified. We will then explain why cobalt has given an entirely different result than carbon would give, and that sodium would have given another effect of unbalanced ejections, while sodium chloride would give a balanced effect, and tantalum would have given another effect from the one produced by cobalt. In other words, when it is shown WHY cobalt emitted a large electron from one end and a small one from the other, and it

[p. 272]

can be clearly explained WHY every single unit atom and every paired one will give different, and predictable results, it will then be easy to comprehend why the conclusions arrived at by this experiment are invalid. To begin with, the experiment itself should not have been necessary. With a true knowledge of the Nature of electricity the right results would have been predictable. To substantiate this statement we will predict other results from the same experiment with full knowledge that they will be as stated.

Step No. 1. We quote from "Life:" "A crystal containing cobalt nuclei was placed in a magnetic field created by current flowing through a wire coil. It was already known that the cobalt nuclei would line up in the magnetic field."

Fig. 69 indicates the wire coil, the direction of the electric current, and the position within it that the cobalt crystal is placed. The first wrongly assumed premise is that the wire coil creates a magnetic field. It creates an electric field, not a magnetic one. There are no magnetic fields in Nature. There are electric fields of curved motion, which are bounded by magnetic planes of non-motion and zero curvature. It must be borne in mind

[p. 273]

always that any expression of motion anywhere, is omnipresently repeated everywhere. The human consciousness has not quite acquired that sense of omnipresent repetition as yet but familiarity with it through TV and radar is developing it. This cobalt experiment is, therefore, not a local happening which is taking place in Columbia University and nowhere else. The electric field provides for it to happen there but the magnetic geometry of the zero universe provides for it happening universally by Nature's radar system of extensions from zero points of stillness, which become mirror planes of stillness invisibly formed in space to repeat the divisions and multiplications of motion in any part of the universe to every part of it.

The wire coil of the Columbia experiment has given no thought to the basic fact that electricity divides for the purpose of multiplying. Otherwise, the coil it made for its electric field would be like Fig. 70.

We cite this fact for any experimental work done in a laboratory is valid only if it conforms with the electric current of Nature, which alone creates the universe. Any experiment, whatsoever, which does not fit within the principles of the electric current is invalid, for nothing outside of Nature can be valid.

Step No. 2. The cylindrical coil made for the creation of an electric field does not, in any respect, conform with the electric current, which divides the stillness of cathodes into moving pairs, for the purpose of multiplying the motion of those moving pairs to create the heat and compression necessary to simulate the IDEA, which concentrated electric Mind-thinking desires to give objective expression to. The Einstein Equation properly defined this principle by the words which say that fast motion multiplies electric potential, but that principle has not been applied to the mechanics of coil making. For that reason the loops of force which cylindrical coils create, are not focused as they would be if they followed the crystalline shape of the balanced electric current as shown in Fig. 70.

If you will study the corner reflectors of radar, as shown in figures 62-63, and their relation to ring projections from inert gases, and observe their spiral formation, as shown in Fig. 64,

[p. 274]

you will better comprehend the wave, which controls the construction of all matter.

The two essentials omitted for the perfect carrying out of this experiment, up to this point, are 1- failure to conform to the working principles of the electric current, and -2- failure to conform to the omnipresence of Nature by making electrical fields to conform with the mathematics of dividing and multiplying pressures.

Step No. 3. We again quote from "Life": "The test was based on the previously proven fact that the nucleus of the atom 'decays.' In the process it emits one electron and one electrino (an uncharged particle even smaller than an electron)."

It was not necessary to prove that cobalt "decays." To decay means to disintegrate, depolarize, discharge and die. All matter does that, whether atom or man. This experiment, however, did not assist in the decay process, for it lined up the gravity shaft of cobalt with the gravity shaft of the electric field. That is a process of polarization, which divides any one electrical condition into pairs. The process of decay is an opposite effect. It ejects rings from equators, as clearly shown in Saturn - see Fig. 4 - and in Jupiter - see Fig. 3.

Also the statement that uncharged particles are ejected from one end is not true to Nature. There are no uncharged particles in Nature. Wherever there is matter there is motion. Motion is an electric effect, which charges all matter.

Step No. 4. "According to parity, as they spun half of them should have emitted their electrons from the "north" end of the magnetic field and the other half toward the "south." Actually far more electrons came out of the "south" end of the nuclei. By repeating the test under varying conditions, it was verified that cobalt nuclei emit electrons from one particular end. This shows that one end of the nucleus is different from the other, something never known before." ("Life")

Let us analyze these statements to see if there is right reasoning in them in accordance with the electric current. In the

[p. 275]

"Life" diagram, large particles, labeled electrons, are being ejected from the south pole of the cobalt atom and small ones, called electrinos, are being ejected from the north end. Fig. 69 is an interpretation of the "Life" diagram excepting that we are using only one particle. The "Life" diagram shows three cobalt particles, oval shaped, and their respective small and large ejected particles. The names of these particles is of no import here, but the fact that one end of cobalt atoms ejects big particles, and the other ejects small particles, is important. Also, the statement that it was never known before that one end of an atom is different from the other end is also important for it is not true. It has been known as long as electricity has been known that each end of a polarized body is different, and all matter is polarized. Each end of a balanced atom - which means equally paired - will emit the same sized particles from each end, because polarized, or divided pairs, are male and female and belong to the red and blue sides of the spectrum. The important fact that has been overlooked is the fact that an unbalanced particle of matter cannot emit equal potentials from both ends.

To demonstrate this fact put a cobalt, or steel needle in the position given to the cobalt particle. You will see that both ends are different, and are not interchangeable, unless repolarized in reverse. You might better comprehend this if you lower two needles toward the center of the coil. You will find one reaching out for the north and the other reaching out for the south. Now try again with a steel or cobalt rod as long as the field. By placing it in the conical coil shown in Fig. 70, you will now see that not only are both ends different, but also the middle is different. Both ends are polarized gravity centers for high electric potential, and the middle gives no evidence of gravity, for the electric potential is zero in the middle. (In an unbalanced metal, like cobalt, the middle is a little off-center.) The reason for that is that the middle is the cathode dividing point, and the ends are anodes, which unite as one. In other words, the reason both ends are different is because one end is red - or male end - and the other is blue - or female end. Cobalt is preponderantly blue, or female. The red end of the spectrum is weak in it. Under such

[p. 276]

conditions of unbalance the polarization process could not possibly eject equal potentials.

To better understand this take the cobalt out entirely. Only the zero of equilibrium is now there. Now turn on the current and you immediately divide that equilibrium, balanced zero into four opposite and equal pairs, all of which units are in perfect balance with their mates. The cathode is also in the exact middle instead of being off-center. That is the way Nature creates atoms. Cobalt is an unbalanced unit of a pair. It cannot be divided into equal pairs when used as a cathode.

If we now put a piece of the metal cobalt between two coils like Fig. 70, the middle will become the plane of highest potential and its center will "attract" a needle if held toward any point of its circumference. If cobalt is thus placed in the anode position, instead of in the cathode, there will be no ejection of electrons and neutrinos from its polar ends. Instead of that, there will be ring ejections from the equatorial plane of maximum high potential, maximum heat and maximum density. We now have the decay process instead of the polarization process.

Step No. 5. One should now be able to fully comprehend that if one attempts to divide an unbalanced element like cobalt, by polarizing it, one will obtain an unbalanced result. Carbon, for example, is a balanced dual element. It is true cube and is white, while cobalt is distorted cube and is blue. The same experiment tried with carbon, or sodium-chloride, or potassium-bromide, would give balanced results. The ejections from both ends would be the same. If, on the contrary, sodium-iodide, or potassium-chloride is used the results would be as unbalanced as these latter pairs are unbalanced. Each of these pairs crystallize in distorted cubes while the evenly mated pairs crystallize in true cube, like carbon.

The familiar bar magnet, created by the electric current, will serve as a clarifying example of balance in the elements, which are all created in pairs, but are as often united as unbalanced pairs as balanced ones.

Step No. 6. In further statements made in "Life," "SCIENCE NEWS LETTER," and many other newspapers, it is claimed

[p. 277]

that the discovery of different ends to atomic particles, and emissions of other particles from opposite ends, gives to each emitted particle "a spin in the direction of its motion." As the motion of these ejected particles is claimed to be in opposite directions the result of the discovery has "proved" that motion is two-way, "which means right-handed and left-handed."

To explain to you how utterly impossible it is for this to take place in Nature, and again to show how easily the senses can be persuaded to believe as facts the very opposite of what is factual, we have to go back to the utter simplicity of the fundamentals of our universe and lead up to a comprehension of such an impossibility. We will do this as simply and briefly as possible. In other words we will return to the electric current and compare this experiment to just one cycle of it. We, therefore, first postulate the basic fact that, in all this universe, there is only one direction to motion, but that one direction produces two opposite series of effects.

Rain falls to the ground and rises as vapor. That seems to be two directions. A cyclone is anti-clockwise in the northern hemisphere and clockwise in the southern hemisphere. Right-handedness and left-handedness, up and down, in and out, hot and cold, life and death, expansion and contraction, and a hundred other opposite pairs of effects are produced by one direction of motion in this pulsing universe. If we had to clarify this idea for a teenage boy we would tell him to take a pencil and a large piece of paper, then begin drawing a closing spiral, clockwise, starting slowly from way out into space, and increasing his speed constantly as he turns around a hole in the center. We would tell him to keep on drawing in the same direction around that hole but go outward spirally and decrease his speed continually until he got way out into blank space again. We would tell him to keep on repeating that operation over and over again, without changing direction.

Let us now look at this drawing, Fig. 71. Two effects have been produced in this opening-closing universe of compression-expansion - life-death - and inbreathing-outbreathing sequences. Density has been created in the direction of the center and po-

[p. 278]

tential has lowered in the direction of the circumferences. So, also, has heat, and speed, and high potential been created at the center and their opposites out in space. Fig. 71 is the demonstration of this fact as drawn by a child for simple understanding.

[p. 279]

Fig. 72 demonstrates this one direction for a two-effect principle in small scale matter. Figures 73 and 74 demonstrate the same principle in large scale matter. Nature does not have one law for atomic scale, and another for stellar scale. She has only one way of constructing matter, and that is fully covered in the electric current and the octave wave.

Step No. 7. There is no right-handedness nor left-handedness in Nature, but its every effect causes the illusion of right-handedness and left-handedness. That illusion belongs to the senses, therefore, and not to Nature. Our senses have become so fixedly

[p. 280]

accustomed to dual direction that it is difficult to explain it away, for the human understanding of omnipresent Oneness has not sufficiently unfolded as yet to make it easily comprehensible. We will endeavor to do so, however, by the use of child primer simplicity.

As a first step we again remind you that Nature creates everything in pairs, and that all pairs unite to form masses. The hemispheres of a sun are united pairs, for example. Try, therefore, as a first mental exercise, to image the uniting of two

[p. 281]

hemispheres of the sun, which are spinning in opposite directions. The fact that you, yourself, are right-handed and left-handed, adds to the difficulty of the subtle thing which we must explain about our universe, which has led these observers to form such conclusions. What we mean by this is that Nature is bilateral. Everything which is created is equally extended in pairs from a cathode dividing equator. The equator acts as though it were a mirror. It reflects each extended unit of each pair in reverse. These divided pairs unite as two hemispheres of a sphere, which is also divided by an equator.

As a second mental exercise consider your own body in this light. The equator of your body is a plane extending through it

[p. 282]

between your eyes, which divides your body into right-handed and left-handed units of pairs. During the millions of years of your unfolding your senses have translated unitary facts as dual effects. Let us demonstrate this idea. Imagine that you can reach out with your right hand and grasp the right-hand end of the earth's pole of rotation. With your left hand you reach out and grasp the left end of that pole. If you stand there, as rigidly as steel, the equator of the planet and the equator of your body are in the same plane. This being true one of your eyes is on the right side of the equator and the other is on the left. In this position both of your eyes see only the one effect of the planet's spinning in the same direction. Now bend your body so that both of your eyes can see what the right side of the planet is doing. You now see a clockwise direction to the spinning of the planet. Now bend your body so that both of your eyes can see what the left side is doing. You now see an anti-clockwise spinning. In other words you see opposite directions of motion where there is but one direction.

We will again demonstrate this by having you hold a pencil in each hand in such a manner that both touch the spinning planet at points to the right and to the left of its equator. As the earth spins you move both pencils slowly toward the stillness of the pole of rotation. If it were now possible to remove these two pencilings from the planet and lay them flat before you, you would again see them as oppositely directioned, right-hand and left-hand, clockwise and anticlockwise spirals, as shown in Fig. 66. Your senses have told you that because your senses, and your body, are dual. Mind-knowing is not divided, however, so if you unite that divided pair of drawings you can no longer sense two directions. Try it. Paste the two penciled diagrams together. Hold them to the light and you will see that both opposite directions are one. If you fold Fig. 66 at the horizontal line, you would find that both opposite spirals follow the same direction.

This is exactly what the Lee-Yang experimenters have done. Their coil of motion, which caused the division, turns but one way, just as the sphere which you have held between your hands,

[p. 283]

turns but one way. The particles have been ejected from that coil in an angle of 90 degrees from their plane of motion yet it is now held that these particles turn right-handed from one end to turn in the direction of its motion, and particles ejected from the other end turn left-handed for the same reason. This creates the utterly impossible condition of giving matter two shafts of gravity, which are at right angles with each other, as shown in Fig. 75.

Nowhere in Nature is there a precedent for projected masses spinning in the direction of their motion. A bullet from a rifle spins around its axis of direction. Rifle barrels are spirally grooved to accentuate this spin. Even if bullets are spherical, like cannon balls, they would still spin around their axis of direction, for their equators must necessarily be at an angle of 90 degrees from their gravity shafts, and no mass in Nature spins in any other direction than that of its equator.

It is a commonly known fact by every physicist and laboratory worker that electricity runs only in the direction of the turnings in a solenoid coil. Every such worker is also perfectly familiar with the effect of polarization which evidences its effect at 90 degrees from the direction - and plane - of the electric current. These two seeming directions, and effects, are confusing to him

[p. 284]

for the idea of polarization, as an extension of stillness, has not yet entered his thinking. It is new thinking but it must someday be realized that a three dimensional universe is only an illusion caused by polarization, and that there is no motion, whatsoever, in the direction of gravity shafts, which contribute to the three-dimensional illusion. This leads us to the final step.

Step No. 8 is the last of the wrongly assumed premises which we must explain away. This last premise states, in essence, that as matter spins in the direction of its motion, and as there are two opposite directions of motion in which particles are projected from opposite cobalt ends, is it henceforth to be a law that: "Particles will now be referred to as 'right-handed' or 'left-handed' contrary to what the principle of parity held."? ("Life")

This is again difficult to explain in this early stage of Mind-unfolding. To attempt to explain it requires combating what our senses sense, and what our Mind knows. Again we will attempt it by child primer simplicity. The fallacy of this entire statement lies in the belief that the two opposite directions, which the projected particles are following, are directions of motion. Herein lies the cause of the misconception, which pure illusion of motion is accountable for. These two opposite directions in which the cobalt particles have been projected are not the direction of motion, they are points or shafts within the stillness of the zero universe which have become identifiable by motion. The one direction of motion is that of rings which encircle that projected direction within stillness in planes of ninety degrees from it.

The human Mind has not quite progressed to that point where it can separate illusion from its cause, and our difficulty in clarifying the illusion is due to the aeons in which we have seen boats, planes, clouds, people and countless other expressions of energy move from place to place within the omnipresence of gravity to simulate that energy, which they are but expressing. Our senses have accustomed us to believe that the direction of motion is the direction in which we see an object change its position. Our knowing Mind, however, attributes that seeming

[p. 285]

change of position to gravity division of omnipresent Oneness, and attributes its cause to the direction of motion, which spins around this direction at an angle of ninety degrees from it. To clarify this new thinking we shall go back to the electric wave within which all of the secrets of Creation are hidden. Bear in Mind that the electric wave is the divider of ONE into four pairs which constitute ONE. As we explain this thought turn back to figures 17 to 29 - to give objectivity to them.

Now vision the universe as all cathode - which means all zero - as visualized in Fig. 6. All motion begins at a cathode point in space, which is all cathode. It cannot move out of that omnipresent position, however, without dividing its seeming energy into four radar-acting pairs in the wave, which is beginning to construct, nor can it do so without measuring out its own desire-energy into countless billions of other cathodes throughout all omnipresence.

At this point turn back to the two cyclone drawings, figures 51 and 52. You will see there a zero which centers the cathode of that hurricane, which we call the eye. There is no object there, such as a mouse, or man, or thousand ton boat, or a crystal of cobalt, but there could be. It would make no difference as long as they are still and have not expressed a desire to move the whole universe, which must automatically move when they move. Electricity divides stillness. Motion then begins, but not until. It seems platitudinous for us to say that when we start a boat from that point, or a bullet, that neither of them are moving in the direction that our senses tell us they are moving, and it seems quite ridiculous to go beyond that and say that neither of them are moving at all in any direction, yet it is necessary to utterly change our knowing from what our senses tell us in this respect if we desire to comprehend the illusions of our three-dimensional mirrored universe and its very deceptive ways.

When our senses tell us that a speeding bullet is not a direction of motion it is difficult to think of it as stillness which is centering fast moving motion. It might help to remold your concept by imagining a motionless, floating cloud which changes its position because of a wind. The direction of motion is not in the cloud.

[p. 286]

It is in the spiraling of the wind. The cloud is still in the same position in relation to gravity even though its position has been changed by motion, which is outside of itself, for it is still floating at rest. Even the slightest change in its position of stillness causes a spiral motion to encircle it and spin around it at an angle of 90 degrees from its gravity shaft, which extends from the earth. It may be quite an effort to comprehend that stillness cannot change, but can seem to. When you have fully grasped this fact, however, much that is complex will become simple. If these sincere young physicists had that Mind-awareness they would not have reasoned as they did in relation to an experiment, which they have mistaken to be something other than the simple, basic polarization process of Nature which extends the two-dimensional thought-ring universe into a three-dimensional, dual action universe.

Nor would they have come to the conclusion stated by them had they observed the majestic example in the heavens of all the planets, suns, spiral nebulae and galaxies which, without exception, turn in planes which parallel their equators, and always at 90 degree angles from their polar shafts.

Every planet and sun in the heavens spins in the same direction that a speeding bullet spins. That direction is 90 degrees from the direction of the speeding bullet, which is always the eye of the cyclone its motion is producing.

Their particles are similar to speeding bullets, or equators of planets and suns which always spin in spiral rings around their gravity shafts, and never in the direction shown in their explanatory drawings.

To aid in making such new thinking clear we will endeavor to express our thoughts by using the language of diagrams and familiar examples, which we will confine within one cycle of the electric current in principle. In thus confining our description of this new thinking within the demonstrable effects within one cycle of the electric current we sincerely hope that future thinking and reasoning will have a better basis upon which to form conclusions, which are not affected by the illusions of motion,

[p. 287]

that have for so long, and so disastrously, affected human reasoning.

There is, in this universe, an underlying principle which has always eluded mankind. If we try to put this principle into words they would read as follows: Every effect of motion is voided as it occurs, is repeated as it is voided, and is recorded as it is repeated. Our senses deceive us in this respect. They see the pendulum swing one way, but the Mind knows that an equal force simultaneously swings the invisible one the other way. That which is divided on one side of the cathode is equally divided on the other side. Likewise, that which is multiplied as it approaches the anode on the red side multiplies equally on the other side. Even time has its backward flow to make time stand still on its zero mark. The pendulum well illustrates this duality in Nature, which makes so many things seem to be other than what they are and to be moving when their moving is voided by an opposite moving. Nature is continually moving to the senses but within Mind-knowing it stands perfectly still as but a thought-picture of Idea. See Fig. 76.

You can readily see why it is difficult to find adequate words to explain a so seemingly universal paradox, and why we must use another language than words. This we shall do step by step very briefly - but sufficient to explain why both ends of the cobalt atom in the experiment emit different sized particles around a center.

1. We must know why this universe is bilateral instead of radial. This means that we should know why mass spins upon a shaft instead of around a center. This also means that we should know why the inward explosion, which basically causes motion in this zero universe, is a centripetal spiral, and why it is returned by radar to the zero of its source as a centrifugal spiral. If we first grasp this one idea we will then know why electricity explodes from the inside outward to divide stillness into pairs of spinning rings, and we shall also know why electricity compresses inward from the outside to form solids. Let this be our first lesson in CAUSE.

[p. 288]

[p. 289]

If you should cause an explosion in the very center of a perfectly spherical room you would form spherical layers of increasingly dense pressures with maximum density at the surface of the sphere. The center of the sphere would be maximum in vacuity. The explosion would be symmetrically radial. The reaction to that explosion would also be its reverse. The reflections which would return by radar from the spherical walls of that room would collide at its very center. Compression would then be exerted from the outside and density would increase in the direction of the center. Nature does not work that way, however. Nature causes her explosions to take place as though they were confined within the flat walls of a room of four or many walls of such shapes as we see in crystals. If you caused such an explosion in your six sided room the outward expansion would no longer be even. It would not even be spherical because of the four corners, which would have to be filled. The outward explosion could no longer produce straight radial lines, which would reflect back in straight radial lines. Every radial line would have to curve in the direction of its corners, and as they approached those corners their curvature would twist and increase in speed as they approached the corners. In a sphere all radial lines are equal, but in a cube the diagonals are longer than the diameters. This fact accounts for the curvature, the spin and the shaft. It also accounts for the disappearance of all curvature.

If you study figures 19 to 43 for better comprehension of this effect, then realize that Nature does not allow any explosion anywhere without repeating it all over her universe, you will soon become familiar with her simple processes. The eight explosions shown in Fig. 77 are in cube relation to explosive charges placed out in open space in a cubic relation to each other. If they expanded into spheres, such as you see in Fig. 78 there would be a lot of empty space between them which Nature does not allow, so they continue to expand until they fill all space. Curvature then disappears and so, also, does motion - as shown in Fig. 79. Every point on every face of those resultant cubes is zero in potential and motion, for they are planes of magnetic Light. They are also mirrors which reverse all direction of motion,

[p. 290]

[p. 291]

which impact against them to extend them into the next wave-field and radar them back to their point of beginning. When the world of science realizes that radar and polarization are one and the same effect it will greatly advance its mechanics, for it is by this principle that any happening anywhere in the universe happens everywhere. This principle is the whole basis of the telephone, radio, television, etc.

We have very briefly described this principle which makes polarization and a bilateral universe not only possible but imperative. Likewise, it makes extension imperative. Now we shall apply this principle to very familiar simple effects.

2. Man makes a big gun by making a long tube which he seals at one end and places an explosive there. He even puts a twist in the bore of the gun; to accelerate the spin of motion around the still shaft which centers that tube. That motionless explosive occupies one still position in this zero universe until he ignites it. What then happens? A two directional explosion takes place. The recoil is equal to the discharge, so he might just as well have left both ends of the gun open as far as the effect of polarization is concerned. The recoil was the opposite direction of polarity, as that explosion began its division of stillness throughout the entire universe, at the speed of 186,400 miles per second.

Let us analyze what has happened. The center of the explosion is an unchangeable point of stillness in the Magnetic Light of Creation, but we will call it gravity because we are seemingly dividing it into a shaft. Because of the tube the explosion cannot expand symmetrically and radially from the point in space which it occupied while still, for it is not enclosed in a sphere. It is enclosed in a shaft. Its spinnings encircle the walls of the tube at ninety degrees to the still shaft, which is developed because the explosion can no longer be centered as one point in space, and, therefore, have but one center of gravity instead of many. It becomes a series of points in space which form a shaft. If you can now comprehend that if the explosion within that tube is obliged to change position and move its centering point of stillness, the projectile which moves is, likewise, a sequence of points of stillness? You cannot see a projectile being ejected from the other end, but its equivalent is in that recoil.

[p. 292]

Can you not see that this same thing applies to an airplane? The plane moves for the same reason. An explosive is placed at one end of a tube, which is made up of an engine and a propeller. The engine is sealed at one end because there is no opposing propeller there. If equal propellers occupied both ends of the engine the plane would not move. Spinning rings then move around a center, instead of an extended shaft of gravity, however, caused by the motion of the propellers. The plane itself would then occupy a position of stillness. Can you not see that it would always occupy a position of stillness, no matter where it seemingly moved? And can you not see that the spinning rings are the cause of that seeming motion? And can you not further see that the direction of motion is not in the projectile, or the plane, or of gravity, but solely in the divided pressures which cause that spinning motion?

3. Let us now take the plane and the projectile out of the tubes, which they centered. We refer you to the two cyclone diagrams again - figures 51 and 52. There is nothing there, whatsoever, which is materially objective at their center. There is only the stillness which we call the eye. There is but an explosion of hot air there, which causes expansion from the inside outward where cold air compresses it from the outside to inner density. Nature has made her two-way "gun" that way - a measure of desire-energy is at its center. The eye is a shaft of gravity. Gravity is omnipresent. What difference whether there is a plane, or bullet there, or not? If there is a plane there, its changed position in one direction is voided by an equal change in the opposite polarity direction.

4. If we go into the machine shop we will see a long shaft with many wheels upon it. They are all turning in the direction of motion yet they are not changing their positions. They perform as much work, or can do as much damage, as the plane or bullet, without changing their gravity position. Which is it, then, which demonstrates power? Is it the direction of motion around stillness, or is it the shifting point of stillness?

5. We now go into the laboratory. The physicist makes a two-way gun, which he calls a coil. He does not seal one end of it for

[p. 293]

he cannot. His electric current goes both ways and spins around its extending shaft in equality of potential. In this way he divides gravity and extends it in such a manner that both of each pair of mates, thus divided, are equal.

We shall now apply this principle to the Lee-Yang experiment. In the coil, above described, there is no material body occupying the cathode position as there is when a plane, or bullet, starts to move. In the Lee-Yang experiment a material body is placed there to be polarized. Cobalt is not a balanced, mated pair, like carbon, however. It is but one of a pair, although it is very close to the balanced amplitude point of its wave. When the current is turned on the resultant effect is as though a steel rod was inserted in the shaft of the coil, which is a half inch in diameter at one end and a quarter of an inch at the other end. Every physicist knows that both ends would then be different, for the equator of the rod would not be in the middle. It would be nearer the small end. The rod would not pick up an equal weight at its opposite ends, for the electric potential which does the lifting, would be unequal. The small end would pick up a greater weight, for its rings would be smaller and spin faster.

Another example will help clarify this one. The gun maker builds a two-way gun but does not seal either end. If the tube is of the same dimension from one end to the other, the projectiles ejected from both ends could be the same size, but if he made one end larger than the other the projectiles ejected from one end would be smaller than those ejected from the other end. For this reason we say that carbon, sodium-chloride, or potassium-bromide would give equal projections from each end, for they are mated pairs, whereas sodium or potassium alone would give as unequal results as unequally mated pairs, and sodium-bromide, or potassium-iodide would give as unequal results in such an experiment as their cube crystals are distorted, and for the same reason.

As our last words in concluding this explanation of the Lee-Yang experiment, and in trying to explain the universe as a

[p. 294]

whole, we will draw a crude picture, which should make it more clear, even to the unimaginative.

The universe is made up entirely of electric thought-waves. Thought-waves are Nature's two-way guns, which are loaded with the energy of Mind-desire to give out from its centering Self to all the universe. That is the explosive which motivates the universe. That is what makes Creation appear and disappear. If you can imagine these two-way spiral guns, which are shaped like the spirals shown all through this book, and if you can imagine them placed muzzle to muzzle all through the universe, you have one part of the picture clearly in Mind. If you also imagine these two-way spiral guns to be of both atomic and stellar dimensions, you will clarify the picture somewhat. The only thing now to complete the picture is in discharging all of these cosmic guns right into each others muzzles so that the explosive, which is projected, collides as hot bodies, which are frozen into solids as they are ejected from the muzzles of those polarizing guns. That is the way that paired units become mated systems, which complete the purposefulness of the universe by regiving to the Creator all that the Creator had given to them.

Thus it is that The God of Love manifests love to the fathers and mothers of Creation, who, in turn, manifest love by their equal givings and regivings of each to each other as united pairs, and they, in turn, regive of love to their Creator to become One with Him.

Thus it is that matter is created by the process of heating it by fast motion. Thus it is, also, that the cold of space freezes it to imprison it until it is enabled to generate enough heat for its liberation. This fact is not known by man. He believes that matter is held together from the inside. Because of this belief he does not know that matter is a powder keg which desires to blow up the universe. It is our belief that man will desist from helping matter to blow up the universe when he is made aware of the Nature of matter as it is, instead of the way he thinks it is. That has been our purpose in writing this book. We reverently launch it out upon the world with the hope and deep prayer that it will save the earth from becoming a barren thing, which it will most

[p. 295]

surely become, if the deadly blue killer metals are built into ten ton piles sufficiently long to make it forever impossible to turn back to the normalcy required for organic life. Our last word in closing is to say that a time would be reached within one generation, in which there will be no way to turn back, for the doom of organic life would then be inevitable.

P . S.

A postscript has become suddenly imperative on the eve of going to press, because of an article published in Scientific American for April, 1957. This article, by Philip Morrison, upholds the validity of the conclusion that the Law of Parity is now overthrown, and that a right and left direction must henceforth be recognized as a part of natural law.

This conclusion is supported mainly by one of many drawings which illustrate the article. We are publishing that drawing to show that the same mistake has been made by this author that Messrs. Lee and Yang made at Columbia University . See Fig. 80.

At the left of the drawing two particles are turning upon their gravity shafts which could be electrons, planets or suns. Around these spinning masses are circles with arrows which show the direction of their turning. Naturally these circles show as an ellipse because they follow equators and are shown in perspective.

At the right of these two spinning masses a mirror has been erected to show that if these two masses were reflected in the mirrors of Nature, such as radar, the spinning would be reversed. Upon this evidence, and similar evidence containing the same fault, a great conclusion of science is now added which upsets the old concept of parity which allowed for no distinction as left and right hand turnings. We have marked this mirror by the letter A.

The great error of this drawing is that pressure mirrors of Nature, such as radar, are not erected upon planes which follow the direction of polarity - or gravity shafts. On the contrary, they are erected in planes of 90 degrees to polarity, or gravity shafts.

We are printing another drawing, Fig. 81, which shows three

[p. 296]

Fig. 80. A mirror placed parallel in plane with the direction of the shaft of gravity, would naturally, show a reverse direction of spinning. But radar, or echo mirrors of Nature are not placed that way. They are placed at angles of 90 degrees from gravity shaft. See Fig. 81.

mirrors which are placed where Nature places them. These we have marked A - A. If you now note the reflections of the turning masses, which we have indicated upon these mirrors, you can plainly see that the one direction of Nature is upheld.

[p. 297]

81. This is the way Nature places her pressure mirrors which retain the same direction of spinning in the mirrors that they spin in the mass which acts upon them. There is no exception to this law throughout all Nature.

To help you visualize this effect more clearly consider how impossible it would be to have a ball rebound into your hand if you threw it against a plane which parallels the direction of your ball. Or consider how impossible it would be for a cliffside to

[p. 298]

echo your voice if the plane of its face followed the direction of your voice - as it does in the Scientific American drawing - instead of in a plane of 90 degrees from the direction of your voice. Once more consider how impossible it would be for radar instruments to detect the presence of a sheet of steel much bigger than a ship, if that sheet of steel was placed the way the mirror in Fig. 80 is placed, instead of being turned around so that its entire face could echo back to the radar instruments.

Nowhere in Nature do pressure walls exist which are not 90 degrees from the direction of polarity. For this reason, the conclusions arrived at in this article to support the Lee-Yang theory are invalid.

Return to Atomic Suicide - the book